Who counts this

1

The idea the site runs on

A headline count is a number without a unit. One hundred and fifty of something is not a sum of money until somebody says what one of them costs and what the thing attached to it demands in return. Supplying that unit is the whole purpose here.

Each sheet does the same three steps. Convert the count into money at a stated price per spin. Price the turnover condition written over it. Print the remainder, in pounds and pence, including where the remainder is nothing. A list of features with no total at the end is unfinished work, and it reads much like every rival page on the question.

One honest label belongs up front. Offers listed on these sheets carry an offshore licence and nothing whatever from Great Britain, which costs a reader a public register, the stake and deposit apparatus, the national self-exclusion scheme, and a regulator who acts on a complaint. That is not a footnote here. It is the main argument for pricing a count in pence before taking one, and the duties are totted up across off the register.

2

Counting, not playing

Modelling, computing and citing is what happens here. Playing does not. No account was opened to produce a figure on this site, no spin was taken, no withdrawal was timed and no cashier was telephoned.

A reader after the conduct of one cashier on one evening last week will not find it here, and should be wary of any page offering it. What is here instead is either a sourced claim with its primary source behind it or arithmetic worked openly on inputs printed beside the answer.

Nor is there a score anywhere. No sheet awards marks, stars or a number out of anything, because a figure nobody can derive is the easiest thing on a page to invent and the hardest to defend. The arithmetic is the judgement, and it is written out letter by letter so a reader can check it or throw it out.

3

What counts as a source here

Facts here come from primary sources and from nowhere else. That means the statute as published, an official register, the licence conditions and technical standards the regulator writes, the advice and the rulings the advertising regulator issues, a scheme’s own site, or a policy document the regulator has put out.

Snippets off a search page do not qualify. Neither does a law firm’s briefing, an industry blog, a trade publication, a rival affiliate page or an operator’s marketing, whatever any of them asserts. Points a sheet would like to make go missing under that rule, and a missing point is written down as a gap instead of being filled from something softer.

Three habits follow from that rule. Where two primary sources disagree, both get named and neither is crowned. A source that could not be reached at all is reported as unreachable, and no substitute is offered for it. Where a document is older than the rule it describes, the sheet gives the document’s date so a reader can weigh it.

The regulatory fact sheet behind these pages was assembled on 15 October 2026, with each claim checked against its own source on that date, and a claim going stale goes stale on a date a reader can see. Anything about a named operator was researched for this site in particular, because a mistake there is a false statement about a company that exists.

4

Four inputs, and no secret ones

Four figures are held still across every sheet: a spin valued at 10p, a reel returning 96 per cent, a turnover multiple of 40 times where an offer carries one, and whole game weighting. Each of them is an assumption, and each is labelled as one wherever it appears.

Holding them still is what makes these sheets comparable rather than a heap. Where one has to be moved, it moves in the open, with its reason in the same sentence. What each letter means, which figures are published rules and where the method stops working are unpacked in how a count is priced.

5

What this page will not tell you

Several things a reader might expect of a page headed like this one are not on it, and the absence is deliberate rather than careless.

No individual is named as an author. No company name, registration or registered office is printed in this text, and no editorial staff list either. Where a reader genuinely needs one, it belongs with whatever ownership details this site publishes elsewhere, or arrives on request.

The reason is the same reason the fact sheet records gaps. A detail invented to make a page look substantial is worse than an admitted blank, and a reader who takes an invented one at face value has been misled by the very thing that made the page feel trustworthy. What can be checked here is the arithmetic and the sources under it, which claims less than most pages in this field claim, and is the only claim these sheets can carry.

6

Lines that do not get crossed

• No brand gets named where the public register shows no operator behind it.
• No operator is described as running a particular offer today. Conditions move weekly, so a kind of condition gets priced instead.
• No payout speed is attached to a name, and no bonus code is printed as current.
• No advice is given about which offer to take, and nothing here is tax, legal or financial advice.
• Nothing is published that would help anybody past a protection, a bank’s own gambling block included. The free protections are described, with their limits, at staying in control.

Show a figure here to be wrong and it gets corrected, with the change stated rather than slipped in, which is what write to us is for. How the work is funded, and the single thing funding cannot buy, stands at how this site is paid.